国产毛片a精品毛-国产毛片黄片-国产毛片久久国产-国产毛片久久精品-青娱乐极品在线-青娱乐精品

查看: 3701|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[好文賞析] ZT: Bringing government debt under control: how painful will it be?

[復制鏈接]
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表于 2010-4-28 18:28:04 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
關鍵詞: Bringing , control , debt , government , painful
Last week I participated in an academics consultant meeting at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to discuss the question of achieving fiscal sustainability. I have posted the note I wrote for the meeting on my web site, but here is a quick summary of some of the points I made:
1. There is no doubt that governments in advanced economies will have to go through major fiscal policy changes in the coming years to keep the debt-to-GDP ratio under control. Given current policies, debt-to-GDP ratios are likely to explode in some cases to 300 or 400% of GDP over the next decades.

2. The required changes are large. The recovery will bring deficits somehow under control but this goes nowhere in terms of achieving sustainability. Most advanced economies need to find additional revenues (or cut spending) by a large amount, somewhere in between 4 and 10 percentage points of GDP depending on the country -- and this has to happen every year for the foreseeable future (we are talking about many decades here).

3. There is no mystery to what needs to happen: governments need to increase taxes and reduce spending. Both have economic and political consequences and we need to be as smart as we can to choose changes that are efficient and have limited negative consequences on the economy (and growth).

4. Good news: We have seen large adjustments in government debt before so this adjustment is feasible. No need to go to the post-WWII decades, in the 80s and 90s we saw very large reductions in government debt in many advanced economies. We are talking about reducing the debt to GDP ratio by up to 40 percentage points in a short period of time, such as 10 years.

5. Good news (2): Some of these prior adjustments had limited consequences on growth. We normally tend to think about reductions in government spending and increases in taxes as having negative effects on growth but in several of these adjustments, growth accelerated rather than decreased (we refer to these events as "expansionary fiscal consolidations"). And when growth accelerates, this becomes a virtuous cycle as faster GDP growth reduces the debt-to-GDP ratio, generates tax revenues, etc.

6. Expansionary (growth promoting) fiscal consolidations tend to be associated to decreases in spending rather than increases in taxes and they tend to come together with a series of pro-growth reforms in other areas of the economy (Ireland post-1985 is a perfect example of this).

7. So can we hope for a nice, painless, expansionary fiscal consolidation over the next decades? Not obvious. There are several reasons why those experiences might not be easily replicated this time:

- In some countries, government spending levels have come down relative to where they were in the 80s or 90s. It is not easy to produce a significant decrease in government spending without affecting some basic services provided by the government. More so in the US where government spending is low relative to other (European) advanced economies.


- Some of the expansionary fiscal consolidations benefited from falling interest rates. As an example, Belgium reduced government debt by close to 40 percentage points in between 1996 and 2006 but most if not all of the decrease was linked to falling interest rates on government debt. Currently, there is no room for interest rates to go down. If any, they might go up.


- This time, the consolidation needs to take care of the past (the accumulated level of debt) and the future (the fact that projected deficits given current policies will be very large). The adjustment is larger than what was needed in some of those previous expansion.


8. So my guess is that a "painless" fiscal adjustment is unlikely this time. Taxes will have to play a stronger role and governments will need to strike a balance between the need for additional revenues and the potential negative growth effects that higher taxes might have. This balance will require a strong amount of political leadership and consensus.

Antonio Fatás
您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即注冊

本版積分規則

關于我們  -  服務條款  -  使用指南  -  站點地圖  -  友情鏈接  -  聯系我們
電子工程網 © 版權所有   京ICP備16069177號 | 京公網安備11010502021702
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
主站蜘蛛池模板: 午夜gif视频免费120秒| 欧美性appstin孕妇| 97色伦亚洲自偷| 美女伸开两腿让我爽| 亚洲色图激情文学| 亚洲视频一区二区三区| 天天干伊人| 亚洲 自拍 欧美 综合| 亚洲麻豆精品果冻传媒| 国产精品爽爽久久久久久无码| a视频在线看| 久久精品电影| 网友自拍区视频精品| 日韩精品视频在线观看免费| 日本精品国产| 石原莉奈adn093店长未婚妻| 亚洲小视频在线| 趁老师睡着吃她的奶水| 免费国产网站| 亚洲精品久久YY5099| 一级毛片一| 亚洲成a人片77788| 亚洲国产区男人本色在线观看欧美| 在线播放亚洲精品富二代91| 国产成人理在线观看视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美视频二区| 天天操天天干天天操| 亚洲免费视频一区| 一念永恒87在线观看全集免费播放| 最新99国产成人精品视频免费| 99在线在线视频观看| 久久永久影院免费| 自拍 偷拍 亚洲 经典| 色操网| 亚洲一区在线免费观看| 艳妇偷春| 花季v3.0.2黄在线观看| 亚洲国产精品嫩草影院永久| 亚洲成人精品| 亚洲成a人片在线观看 欧美| 在线观看视频资源|